NEW DELHI (AP) – As some commentators clamored for revenge, India’s government was silent Wednesday on the fallout from clashes with China’s army in a disputed border area in the high Himalayas that the Indian army said claimed 20 soldiers’ lives.
Indian security forces said neither side fired any shots in the clash in the Ladakh region late Monday. China accused Indian forces of carrying out â€œprovocative attacksâ€ on its troops and did not disclose if any of its soldiers died.
It was the first deadly confrontation on the disputed border between India and China since 1975, and while experts said they were unlikely to head into a war, easing tensions quickly would be difficult.
Indian Defense Ministry spokesman Col. Aman Anand did not respond immediately to queries on the situation Wednesday or whether talks were planned to defuse the tensions.
â€œThis will likely be a watershed moment in India-China relations and the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific,” said Abraham Denmark, Asia program director at The Wilson Center. “Weâ€™ve already seen the deadliest clash on the China-India border in over 50 years, both countries are led by men who have embraced nationalism, and both countries are facing tremendous domestic and international upheaval as a result of COVID-19 and other long-standing problems.â€
The main questions now are if either side can find a path to deescalation and whether India’s allies such as the United States will help. â€œIt is a highly volatile and dangerous situation between two nationalistic, nuclear powers at a time when American influence has badly diminished,â€ Denmark said.
China claims about 90,000 square kilometers (35,000 square miles) of territory in Indiaâ€™s northeast, while India says China occupies 38,000 square kilometers (15,000 square miles) of its territory in the Aksai Chin Plateau in the Himalayas, a contiguous part of the Ladakh region.
India unilaterally declared Ladakh a federal territory while separating it from disputed Kashmir in August 2019. China was among the handful of countries to strongly condemn the move, raising it at international forums including the U.N. Security Council.
Thousands of soldiers on both sides have faced off over a month along a remote stretch of the 3,380-kilometer (2,100-mile) Line of Actual Control, the border established following a war between India and China in 1962 that resulted in an uneasy truce.
The Indian Army said 20 of its soldiers died and 17 â€œwere critically injured in the line of duty at the standoff location and exposed to sub-zero temperatures in the high altitude terrain.â€ The statement did not disclose the nature of the soldiersâ€™ injuries.
The troops fought each other with fists and rocks, Indian security officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose the information.
After the clash, the two sides â€œdisengagedâ€ from the area where the the fighting happened, the Indian Army statement said.
The United Nations urged both sides â€œto exercise maximum restraint.”
â€œWe are concerned about reports of violence and deaths at the Line of Actual Control between India and China,” U.N. associate spokesperson Eri Kaneko said. â€œWe take positive note of reports that the two countries have engaged to de escalate the situation.”
Michael Kugelman, a South Asia specialist at the Wilson Center, said that the two countries were unlikely to go to war because they cannot â€œafford a conflict.â€
â€œBut letâ€™s be clear: It beggars belief to think that they can magically deescalate after a deadly exchange with such a higher number of fatalities,â€ he said. “This crisis isnâ€™t ending anytime soon.â€
Vivek Katju, a retired Indian diplomat, said the deadly violence represented a dramatic departure from the four-decades-old status quo of troops from the two countries staring each other down without any fatalities.
â€œThe political class and the security class as a whole will have to do very serious thinking about the road ahead,â€ he said.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian gave no details of any casualties on the Chinese side, but said that China had strongly protested the incident and remained committed to maintaining â€œpeace and tranquilityâ€ along the disputed border.
â€œBut what is shocking is that on June 15, the Indian troops seriously violated the consensus of the two sides, crossed the border illegally twice and carried out provocative attacks on Chinese personnel, resulting in serious physical conflicts between the two border forces,â€ Zhao said.
Indiaâ€™s Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement that the incident happened â€œas a result of an attempt by the Chinese side to unilaterally change the status quoâ€ in the Galwan Valley.
Thousands of soldiers from the two countries, backed by armored trucks and artillery, have been stationed just a few hundred meters (yards) apart for more than a month in the Ladakh region that lies near Tibet. Military and diplomatic meetings have yielded no breakthrough.
Indian authorities have officially maintained near-total silence on the issues related to the confrontation
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a televised meeting with state officials Tuesday and did not comment on the clash.
The tense standoff started in early May, when Indian officials said that Chinese soldiers crossed the boundary in Ladakh at three different points, erecting tents and guard posts and ignoring verbal warnings to leave. That triggered shouting matches, stone-throwing and fistfights, much of it replayed on television news channels and social media.
China has sought to downplay the confrontation while saying the two sides were communicating through both their front-line military units and their respective embassies to resolve issues.
Though skirmishes arenâ€™t new along the frontier, the standoff at Ladakhâ€™s Galwan Valley, where India is building a strategic road connecting the region to an airstrip close to China, has escalated in recent weeks.
The last fatalities along the disputed border was in 1975, when Chinese troops killed four Indian soldiers in an ambush in the Twang region of northeastern Indiaâ€™s Arunachal Pradesh state, said Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda, a former head of the Indian militaryâ€™s Northern Command.
â€œItâ€™s a very complicated and serious situation, and it will take real, hard negotiating skills to resolve this,â€ Hooda said.