WASHINGTON (AP) – President Donald Trump, the historically prolific tweeter of political barbs and blasts, threatened social media companies with new regulation or even shuttering after Twitter added fact checks to two of his tweets. He turned to his Twitter account – where else? – to tweet his threats.
The president canâ€™t unilaterally regulate or close the companies, and any effort would likely require action by Congress. His administration has shelved a proposed executive order empowering the Federal Communications Commission to regulate technology companies, citing concerns it wouldn’t pass legal muster. But that didn’t stop Trump from angrily issuing strong warnings.
Tech giants â€œsilence conservative voices,” he claimed on Twitter early Wednesday. â€œWe will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen.â€ Later, also on Twitter, he threatened, â€œBig Action to follow.â€ And in one more late-night tweet, he said â€œBig Techâ€ was â€œgoing absolutely CRAZY. Stay Tuned!!!â€
Press secretary Kayleigh McEnany told reporters Trump would sign an executive order relating to social media companies but provided no further details. White House strategic communications director Alyssa Farah said Trump would sign it Thursday.
In his tweet, he repeated his unsubstantiated claim – which sparked his latest showdown with Silicon Valley – that expanding mail-in voting â€œwould be a free for all on cheating, forgery and the theft of Ballots.â€
There was no immediate reaction from Twitter to the presidentâ€™s threats.
Twitterâ€™s decision to mark the presidentâ€™s tweets regarding mail-in balloting came as the president was sparking another social media firestorm, continuing to stoke a debunked conspiracy theory accusing MSNBC host Joe Scarborough of killing a former staffer. Prominent Republicans, including Rep. Liz Cheney and Sen. Mitt Romney, urged Trump to drop the attack – which has not been marked with a fact check by the social media company.
Trump and his campaign had lashed out at the company Tuesday after Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots â€œfraudulentâ€ and predicted that â€œmail boxes will be robbed,â€ among other things. Under the tweets, there is now a link reading â€œGet the facts about mail-in ballotsâ€ that guides users to a Twitter â€œmomentsâ€ page with fact checks and news stories about Trumpâ€™s unsubstantiated claims.
Trump replied on Twitter, accusing the platform of â€œinterfering in the 2020 Presidential Electionâ€ and insisting that â€œas president, I will not allow this to happen.â€ His 2020 campaign manager, Brad Parscale, said Twitterâ€™s â€œclear political biasâ€ had led the campaign to pull â€œall our advertising from Twitter months ago.â€ Twitter has banned all political advertising since last November.
Trump did not explain his threat Wednesday, and the call to expand regulation appeared to fly in the face of long-held conservative principles on deregulation.
Trump and his allies have long accused the tech giants in liberal-leaning Silicon Valley of targeting conservatives on social media by fact-checking them or removing their posts. The presidentâ€™s critics, meanwhile, have scolded the platforms for allowing him to put forth false or misleading information that could confuse voters.
Some Trump allies have questioned whether platforms like Twitter and Facebook should continue to enjoy liability protections as â€œplatformsâ€ under federal law – or be treated more like publishers, which can face lawsuits over content.
The protections have been credited with allowing the unfettered growth of the internet for more than two decades, but now some Trump allies are advocating that social media companies face more scrutiny.
â€œBig tech gets a huge handout from the federal government,” Republican Sen. Josh Hawley told Fox News. â€œThey get this special immunity, this special immunity from suits and from liability thatâ€™s worth billions of dollars to them every year. Why are they getting subsidized by federal taxpayers to censor conservatives, to censor people critical of China?â€
Twitterâ€™s first-ever use of a label on Trumpâ€™s tweets comes as platforms gear up to combat misinformation around the U.S. presidential election. Twitter and Facebook have begun rolling out dozens of new rules to avoid a repeat of the false postings about the candidates and the voting process that marred the 2016 election.
The advent of the coronavirus pandemic has further escalated the platforms’ response, leading them to take actions against politicians – a move theyâ€™ve long resisted – who make misleading claims about the virus.
Last month, Twitter began a â€œGet the Factsâ€ label to direct social media users to news articles from trusted outlets next to tweets containing misleading or disputed information about the virus. Company leaders said at the time that the new labels could be applied to anyone on Twitter, and that it was considering using them on other topics.
Twitter has said it will decide internally when to use a label, and on which tweets, and it will draw from information curated from news outlets.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg weighed in on the matter during a Fox News interview Wednesday. â€œWe have a different policy, I think, than Twitter on this,” he said. “I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldnâ€™t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online.â€
Meanwhile, Republicans were turning their fire on one of the Twitter executives responsible for adding the fact checks: Yoel Roth, its head of site integrity. They are pointing to tweets he sent in 2016 and 2017 railing against the president and his allies.
â€œFrom their bogus â€˜fact checkâ€™ of @realDonaldTrump to their â€˜head of site integrityâ€™ displaying his clear hatred towards Republicans, Twitterâ€™s blatant bias has gone too far,â€ tweeted Republican National Chairman Chair Ronna McDaniel.
Jack Balkin, a Yale University law professor and First Amendment expert, said any attempt to regulate social media companies for the content on their sites would likely need congressional input and approval – and probably face strong legal challenges.
â€œThe president canâ€™t do very much, but thatâ€™s not the point,â€ he said. â€œThis is an attempt by the president to, as we used to say in basketball, work the refs.â€
â€œHeâ€™s threatening and cajoling with the idea that these folks in their corporate board rooms will think twice about what theyâ€™re doing, so they wonâ€™t touch him.â€
AP writers Amanda Seitz and David Klepper contributed.